When I try to resolve issues and conflicts, I see a clear gap between expectations of both parties. Most of the times, expectations are not made clear. In professional companies, you make the expectations clear in terms of KRAs & results. But when it comes to the appraisal, managers say, results are ok but still employee needs to improve. There are certain points discussed, which employees are not even heard in past.

Moreever expectations are the reasons behind any conflict. When there are stated expectations in the form of KRAs, Job Descriptions and Competencies, you can avoid the conflict at certain level. But it is upto the manager how he makes it more objective. There are lots of factors where it is very difficult to make the behavioural outcome in objective term and hence it should be related to some results. The results can be the outcome of certain behavioural expectations. Companies try to make it objective by competency mapping and assessment. But I really have a doubt how seriously it is done.
It is very difficult to manage the perceived expectations. Employees also have the perceived expectations from the management; however superior’s perceived expectations are also important to understand. At specific level it is perceived that the next person is matured enough and he understands well the perceived expectations. Everything can not be documented under KRAs, JDs etc. There are certain accountabilities which run between the lines in JDs.
To a large extent, bosses declare that projects/objects have either succeeded or failed based on whether it met their expectations. Few responsibilities fail, in an absolute sense -- they simply fail to meet individual expectations.
Awareness of an employee plays important role in success. You are expected to be smart enough to understand dimensions of human behaviour and thereby perceived expectations also.
(Cartoon Source: http://www.cartoonstock.com/)
2 comments:
No doubt expectations are unmatched always another prospective of this is that everytime is scope for perfection in most of cases. So whatever acheived well in time should be appreciated and next phase for further imporvement should be suggested it should not be projected as threat it should be always as opportunity for furture growth and devlopment
Self analysis can give us upto some extent inner satisfaction which will pave the way to go ahead always for new improvements with enthusiam
P K MISHRA
Interesting.Conflicts are always bring differences and difussions if not looked into resolution at early stage.
Certain personalities related conflicts and ego issues leads to diffusion .It can be resolved through intervention of seniors who is impatial and unbiased.In organisation, irrespective of hirarchy , understanding of issues directly concnerned with organisation interest are important.Time cannot be paramount for resolution of conflicts but proactivenss must to avoid such situations.
Post a Comment